Wednesday, 19 June 2013


19th June 2013 [Blog No. 5]

Hi again, Oxley & Coward solicitors have updated me on the progress of the proposed sale of the Barnes property to the supermarket chain in their letter dated 11 June 2013. For a reason better known to themselves their most recent letter did not contain a copy of the pre-amended head of Terms, which I had requested of the executors and which was in response to their update letter dated 10 May 2013 informing me that the Head of Terms had been amended. My not having a copy of the pre-amended Head of Terms made their update ambiguous.

In my first blog on this matter on 1st May 2013 I referred to discovering an Article in the Rotherham Advertiser dated November 2005 where reference had been solicitor Mr Barry Long (a then Consultant in the firm of Oxley & Coward Solicitors) who had acted on behalf of (I allege) a dubious estate agent who had purchased a detached dwelling from an elderly lady for a insignificant sum of £5,000 when it was realistically worth around £130,000. I mention this again here because I have just obtained permission from the Rotherham Advertiser to reproduce the article on my blog here. I have emailed Mr Turner thanking him for the privilege. See copy of Mr Phil Turner’s email below.

RE: E Peter Barnes (South Anston)

18/06/2013 10:10

Hi Mr Barnes, sorry for delay have been away. Yes, you have permission to reproduce our articles, with a reference to the Advertiser. Cheers, Phil

Phil Turner
DDI: 01709 768141

Rotherham

Advertiser

Part of the Garnett Dickinson Group

Garnett Dickinson Publishing Ltd

Brookfields Way, Manvers, Wath-upon-Dearne, Rotherham, S63 5DL

T: 01709 768000   |   www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk

Registered in England & Wales: No. 2389730

Copied below is the contents of the emails received 18/04/2011 and 19/04/2011 from Mr Phil Turners colleague at the Rotherham Advertiser relating to the Choc-Box Sting Article:-

Article from 11/11/2005 Rotherham Advertiser:-

Choc box sting

Frail—Ambrosine St Clair Fretwell.

PICTURE by KERRIE BATES. AW5800.

EXCLUSIVE by PHIL TURNER

A BAREFACED trickster pulled off an outrageous £100,000 "sting" on a near-blind pensioner by sending her a box of chocolates...

Wealthy 87-year-old Ambrosine St Clair Fretwell was allegedly cheated out of a house worth £130,000—by signing for a bogus "courier" delivery containing chocolates.

But her signature was actually on a folded land registry document purporting to show the sale of the property for a mere £5,000, a court heard. 

Alleged fraudster David Graves later sold the house to two developers for £105,000—a profit of more than 2,000 per cent.  High-flying car sales manager Graves (39), blew most of the money on paying off his mortgage and other debts, a £9,000 BMW, Christmas presents—and gave his ex-girlfriend £5,000 to pay for cosmetic surgery to enlarge her breasts.

Registered blind Mrs Fretwell—who bought the house in Golden Smithies Lane, Swinton, for £42,500 in 1990 as an investment—only found out after it had been sold and put up for auction.  Graves, of Osbert Road, Rotherham, has denied conspiring with Richard Skidmore (35), of Clifton lane, Clifton, to defraud Mrs Fretwell of her legal title and land between July and October last year.

Skidmore—whom Graves knew from a gym club—is alleged to have acted as the courier who delivered the package of chocolates. Graves claims that both transactions were genuine. Skidmore claims he was a witness to Mrs Fretwell's signature to the property transfer document and to the handover of cash.

An estate agent and a solicitors' consultant were also involved in the amazing allegations outlined to a jury at Sheffield Crown Court this week.

Prosecutor, Mr Andrew Kershaw, said that it was a story about "greed, making a quick profit and playing a cynical trick on an elderly lady." He said that the pair's story was the "highly improbable state of affairs of an elderly, partially-sighted lady gifting her £130,000 investment away on her doorstep in the evening gloom to a man who meant nothing to her."

Forensic evidence backs the prosecution claims that the trick was perpetrated on the elderly pensioner, the court heard. Frail but sprightly Mrs Fretwell—who was wearing a bandage on her head as she gave evidence—said that she and her son, James (59), who lived with her, were "absolutely stunned" when they heard what had happened at Christmas time last year.

She said it was "impossible and ridiculous" that she could have signed a Land Registry document.

Mrs Fretwell said that a man arrived with a package which she signed for although she was suspicious it could have been a bomb and was left unopened for weeks. The brown padded package had a 28p first class stamp on it, rather than the correct amount of £1.33, the court heard. "I threw it into the garden and it didn't explode so we opened it," Mrs Fretwell told the jury.

She refuted claims that she had told Graves she wanted to sell the house when he called at her home. "I had no intention of selling it," she said, although it had been valued and put on the market some years before to establish a market valuation and was later withdrawn.

She dismissed defence claims that Graves had in fact sent two boxes of chocolates—the first as an "ice breaker" the second as a "thank you." Graves allegedly called and told Mrs Fretwell he was interested in buying the house for his sister who was returning to the area from Scotland.

Graves claims that he bought the house for his sister, Eva Graves—whose name was used on the contested Land Registry document—but later sold it quickly when her plans changed.

The trial continues.

16/11/05

'Secret society'

'Mafia' claim in fraud case

Reports: PHIL TURNER

A "PROPERTY and football mafia" may be at work in Rotherham, it emerged during the chocolate box sting trial.

The allegation came after prosecutor Mr Andrew Kershaw exposed a "football club network"—allegedly including estate agent Anthony Thickett—during the conspiracy trial of two men for the alleged fraudulent sale of a near-blind pensioner's £130,000 house.

Alleged trickster David Graves got Mr Thickett—of Merryweather's—to sell wealthy 87-year-old Ambrosine St Clair Fretwell's property after she was allegedly cheated out of it when he sent her a box of Milk Tray chocolates.

When she signed for a bogus recorded "courier" delivery containing the chocolates, her signature was actually on a folded land registry document—purporting to show the sale of the property for £5,000, it was claimed. 

Graves (39), later sold the house to two developers for a profit of £105,000.

Mr Kershaw alleged that Graves had it valued at £130,000 with Haybrook's estate agents and went to Mr Thickett "of the football club network" to put it up for sale to the developers.

During questioning of Graves, Mr Kershaw wondered why he had gone to Mr Thickett instead of Haybrook's when Mr Thickett's valuation was lower. Graves said that his brother played football with Mr Thickett.

Mr Kershaw inquired if there was a "secret society of football-playing estate agents."

Graves replied that the reason for using Merryweather's was that it was the main estate agents on the property scene in Rotherham. Mr Thickett charged Graves an "introducer's fee" of £500 for the sale to property developers, Robert Brown and Timothy Turner.

Mr Thickett had dealt with the men before and they were part of his "bank" of prospective buyers, the court heard.

Graves' barrister, Mr Christopher Mills, asked his client if there was "a football and property mafia" in Rotherham dealing and passing on information, and if he was part of it.

"If there is sir, I'm not part of it," Graves replied, adding that he did not play football and did not know of such a group.

Regional car sales manager Graves—whose hobby was collecting watches—spent most of the money on paying off his £64,000 mortgage and other debts, buying a £9,000 BMW, Christmas presents and a 17th birthday car for his niece—plus £5,000 to his ex-girlfriend for cosmetic surgery to enlarge her breasts.

Registered blind Mrs Fretwell—who bought the house in Golden Smithies Lane, Swinton for £42,500 in 1990 originally to live in but later kept it as an investment—only found out after it had been sold and put up for auction.

Graves, of Osbert Road, Rotherham, has denied conspiring with Richard Skidmore (35), of Clifton Lane, Clifton, to defraud Mrs Fretwell of her legal title and land between July and October last year. Skidmore—who Graves knew from a gym club—is alleged to have acted as the courier who delivered the package of chocolates. Graves claims both transactions were genuine and that Mrs Fretwell wanted to sell the house to spite her son, James. Skidmore claims he was a witness to Mrs Fretwell's signature to the property transfer document and to the handover of cash.

Giving evidence himself, Mr Thickett said that Graves told him he had offered £50,000, but Mrs Fretwell said £5,000 was sufficient.  Mr Thickett added: "He told me he had paid a very good price. I took him at his word and he said he would like us to sell it. "He told me he had paid £5,000 for it a few days later and that he had offered £50,000 but £5,000 was sufficient." When asked if the owner was "barking mad" or irrational, he said it was unusual but not that strange.

Mr Thickett, who said that he knew Graves had used solicitor Mr Barry Long in the transaction, added that he had no view on it and had experience of similar unusual sales.

"I was surprised, knowing the house, that he had bought it for £5,000, but I didn't think it was actually strange," Mr Thickett, who had been interested in the property for more than ten years, told the court. He said that keys consisted of a door handle which could only have been been received from Graves.

Mr Thickett said that his understanding was that Graves' sister's name was on the ownership of the house, which he assumed was for tax reasons. He assumed that Graves, who stipulated he did not want to be part of a chain, had "clean ties." Mr Thickett confirmed that he had been in Las Vegas for his 40th birthday at the time of the offer from developer Mr Robert Brown.

In a statement read to the jury, Mr Barry Long, a consultant working for Oxley and Coward, said that Graves had told him he was purchasing the house for his sister Eva and all documents and deeds were in her name. The Land Registry document was signed "A Fretwell (Mrs)" and witnessed by co-accused Richard Skidmore.

Graves received a cheque for more than £109,000 from the sale, according to Mr Long.

He said that if he had known it was not above board he would not have become involved.

The court heard that the solicitor for Mr Brown and Mr Turner had been told that Mr Long had posted the Land Registry document to Mrs Fretwell. But Graves has maintained that he (Graves) picked up the form from Mr Long's office.

Unfortunately, and as you can see from blog No. 3 on 21/5/2013, my three sisters wrote to Mr Long in a “Dear Barry” email dated 2nd January 2012 suggesting Merryweathers should be the newly instructed agents, and I have to say here that had I read the above-mentioned article with more diligence and seen that it was an employee of Merryweathers’ that had been involved in the above-mentioned Choc-Box Sting I most certainly would not have gone along with my three sisters’ proposal of letting Merryweathers manage and sell the estate, albeit they had said that I was not to be involved!!!

It also has to be said in Merryweathers’ favour, that when asked why there had been no advertising of the Barnes Property as being for sale, Mr Nick Wilson of Merryweathers did confirm in a sound recorded meeting at Oxley & Coward Solicitors on 7th December 2012 that the reason for them not marketing the Barnes Property as been for sale was because they had not received any instructions to do so by the executors. [My Ref. Paginated page 524 refers]. It follows that the executors clearly have not diligently administered the sale and distribution of our late mother’s estate in accordance with their obligations!

This true story continues …..

3 comments:

  1. There is a very true story behind all this.

    A conviction was obtained in The High Court on the grounds of fraud, and the fraudulent Transfer was declared Void on the grounds of non est factum, (not his/her deed) More to follow.

    ReplyDelete